Welcome to Wycombe Labour's Website

Latest Stories

Wycombe Labour believes that PREVENT the counter terrorism programme, is a counter-productive strategy and does not deal with the problems of extremism.  WDC cannotgive any data on its success, what kind of extremism it has stopped nor how much money it gets for PREVENT. 

We asked WDC a few questions on PREVENT through aFreedom of Information (FOI) request, but received largely evasive answers to most questions, and some questions were left unanswered. We then asked WDC to conduct an Internal Review of their decision, which led to the same result. Finally we complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office, who investigated whether WDC complied with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) investigated whether the answers provided by WDC to our questions were in line with FOI policy, and whether or not they should have given more detail. Whilst the ICO agreed with WDC’s response to most questions, it has adjudged that Wycombe District Council should:

“Confirm if information is held for part 10 and provide any recorded information in the scope of the request, subject to the application of any exemptions.”

We asked in part 10 “How do WDC and the police coordinate their efforts?” – The ICO wants the council to at least confirm through noting of meetings in a diary kept by WDC officers, (as minutes are apparently not taken of such meetings) as to how the police and WDC coordinate their efforts. 

While the ICO believes other parts of the request were answered adequately, we believe that it is inexplicable as to why the following questions were not answered:

Can you provide a breakdown of the number of people referred to PREVENT by ethnic origin and religion within WDC?” – WDC initially stated that to provide this information was a national security risk. After our complaint to the ICO, WDC confirmed that the only information on demographics was types of ideologies referred and this is held by the Counter Terrorism Unit (CTU) in the police. We still consider this explanation unsatisfactory, as there are communities being victimised due to PREVENT.


“How does WDC consult the community on the PREVENT programme?”  

WDC replied that “The Council has not undertaken public consultation and considers it would not be appropriate to do so, as this is a central government programme with local implementation.”

This means WDC does not care that a whole community is under suspicion without any explanation. “A central government programme with local implementation” – meaning public servants, teachers and hospital staff have a statutory duty to do the job MI5 is supposed to do.  Further showing how the basic human rights of a whole section of the community are being undermined.

Rafiq Raja, leader of the Labour group on WDC, attended PREVENT training and has said that It is essential that we live in a safe environment and those who pose a threat to our security are apprehended, but the minutia of the Prevent programme in action is very perplexing. The Prevent trainingwas eye opening in the sense that it provided evidence of how little things can add to create a profile of someone, even a child, as being radicalised (2 & 2 adding up to 5). The programme is having the conveyor belt argument that if a person is becoming more ‘religious’ or styles his facial hair in a certain way then they are at risk of radicalisation, indeed the methodology of identifying suspects becomes one in one with treating a large part of the Muslim community as suspected terrorists, as it is based on a flawed methodologyand its use of teachers and other public servants is sowing seeds of suspicion and alienating members of the Muslim community.” 

Between 2012 and 2014, 56% of PREVENT referrals overall where of Muslims. This is disturbing, when one considers that the Muslim community accounts of 4.8% of the UKpopulation

The ex-Shadow Home Secretary, Andy Burnham has called PREVENT ‘toxic’ and called for it to be scrapped. He also described it as a “policy felt highly discriminatory against one section of the community. He further went on to say “It is creating a feeling in the Muslim community that it is being spied upon and unfairly targeted. It is building a climate of mutual suspicion and distrust. Far from tackling extremism, it risks creating the very conditions for it to flourish.”

Not only this, on a national level, the National Union of Teachers (NUT), National Union of Students (NUS) and Universities  and Colleges Union (UCU) have official policy against the PREVENT agenda, showing the extent of discord among students, academics and teachers. 

PREVENT both treats communities as suspects with implausible evidence, and WDC is being secretive and its answers to the various questions about its use of PREVENT in our schools, hospitals, universities and colleges shows a lack of accountability and transparency in public life and Wycombe Labour believes this cannot be good for community cohesion


Mahamid Ahmed

SecretaryWycombe Labour



1. Copies of the correspondence are available on request.
2. WDC declined to answer 4 of our 10 questions about PREVENT.  We asked for an internal review in line with Freedom of Information procedures. The internal review confirmed the previous decision not to provide the information.  
3. Wycombe Labour then appealed to the Information Commissioner.
4. The Information Commissioner found that WDC did not comply with FOIA for one of the questions “How do WDC and the police co-ordinate their efforts?”
5. Wycombe Labour is considering further action in the form of appeal on Information Rights 
6. Quote from Andy Burnham is taken from a speech he made at the Chamber of Commerce in Manchester in June 2016
7. Statistic on Muslims as a % of population taken from Muslim Council of Britain (MCB)
8. Statistic on % of referrals to PREVENT which are Muslim taken from National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC)




PREVENT strategy is counterproductive

Wycombe Labour believes that PREVENT the counter terrorism programme, is a counter-productive strategy and does not deal with the problems of extremism.  WDC cannotgive any data on its success, what kind of extremism it has...

At yesterday's council meeting, where the annual budget was presented, Cllr. Rafiq Raja called out the local Conservatives on their constant mismanagement of Wycombe's budget and the real affect it is having on local people.

Here is his full response to yesterdays budget:

"For any local government organisation, the financial plan is supposed to support the plan for delivering services to residents and the community. The budget should serve the district council, not vice-versa.


The officers who have been instrumental in producing the budget have to be congratulated for having produced a balanced budget within the parameters given to them. Naturally, the political direction must come from the party in charge and lest we forget “the budget is based on information and assurances from members and the senior management team”. Moreover, an explanatory note attached to the draft budget to the cabinet, says clearly that “the council faces a significant challenge in continuing to deliver a balanced budget and will either need to implement significant income growth policies or service reduction” so you have it in a nutshell!


The creation of the new unitary system of local government is no doubt going to ensure that some of the estimates are going to be wildly out of synch; the budget is just a ‘fire fighting’ exercise.


So, yes, we have a balanced budget and ‘earmarked reserves’ of over £36M but where is the overall reference to the ‘big picture’, for societies are judged not just on what the majority of the people attain but what the minorities have to endure.


We certainly live in an affluent part of the country and we are repeatedly told that we are doing very well.


So after years of Conservative control at County and District levels, what do we see?


  1. In our prosperous part of the country we have pockets of deprivation, for example, a third of children in the East side of Wycombe and Castlefield and a quarter in Bowerdean live in poverty. These are not my figures but produced by the Centre for Policy studies.


  2. The Conservatives boast about excellent schools and many support the extension of the Grammar schools. Yet they pay little attention to the educational attainment gap, between the different socio economic groups, which continues to be one of the widest in the country.


  3. Indeed, the school system is practically dysfunctional, given that upper schools are going to have reduced funding imposed upon them as a change in the funding formula.


  4. A few developments for affordable housing have been undertaken, but who can afford to buy a place in Dawes Hill? There is no mention of any programme to offer affordable housing to people on lower incomes or the young.


  5. Many of the roads and footpaths in Wycombe are in a pitiful state and it is not easy to get even street lights repaired, without people having to email the relevant people and then act as progress chasers.


  6. We have already heard about the ANPR fiasco, which  has cost a tidy sum in lost revenue for WDC.


  7.  There is no enforcement of traffic parking rules and as a result commercial vehicles and cars are parked on footpaths and verges.


  8. The people of High Wycombe yearn for the town to have its own A & E, but no one is listening. Less charitable people than me believe that it is because no cabinet member represents a Town ward?

  9. You may also have seen (in last week’s BFP), which reported the   “Council’s broken record over homelessness crises”. It is reported that residents and homeless charities fear that WDC has resorted to ‘insidious measures to force people out of the town’s multi story car parks as temperatures plummeted below zero. Apparently, loud repetitive music is being played into town centre car parks in a bid to drive vulnerable rough sleepers onto the streets. So is this the compassionate side of the Conservative party at work? Why some of the reserves cannot be used to help such small but vulnerable groups is difficult to comprehend. Yet we are quite happy, as a council, to pay our share of £25K for the commissioning of the Unitary Authority report of our choice.


  10.  You may also have noticed that there are a number of empty and boarded up shops and offices in the town, go to the Chilterns Centre or walk between the White Hart Street entrance to the Eden shopping Centre and Oxford Road; what does this tell us about the state of the business in the Town?.


  11.  We were told that there was consultation with the business community about which way the unitary authority debate should head but this democratic luxury was not offered to the residents, who are going to be affected and will have to pay for it.


Mr Chairman Since it is clear that this council has no plan for sustainable delivery of key services, this financial plan is effectively meaningless, it is just a set of numbers."

Wycombe deserves better than hopeless Tory budgets

At yesterday's council meeting, where the annual budget was presented, Cllr. Rafiq Raja called out the local Conservatives on their constant mismanagement of Wycombe's budget and the real affect it...

Today, the Wycombe Labour Party posted the following letter to Steve Baker MP. We look forward to his reply.


Dear Steve Baker MP,


We are writing to you today to express our deepest concerns with the developments surrounding the upcoming “Brexit” negotiations. Being an MP, you will know all too well that our country is severely divided by the EU referendum result. As MP of Wycombe, you will also be able to understand that the 52% of your own constituents who voted to Remain are feeling very uncomfortable at the thought of exiting the single market, and that’s not including any Leave voters who were under the impression that we had no intention of leaving the single market. 

We respect the democratic result of the referendum, and we also respect that you decided to back the Leave campaign, but it is simply wrong to ignore the concerns of your constituents. Your constituents understand that you are a passionate Leave supporter, but now is the time to serve those people who have leant you their powers, and do the right thing to try and heal the divides caused by the EU referendum. 

We respect the result of the referendum, acknowledging that the majority of those who voted wanted to leave the EU. However, this was not the case in your constituency of Wycombe. This is why we are asking for you to come to the compromise of demanding and supporting full access to the single market. By taking this action, you will be both respecting the overall EU referendum result, and also addressing the concerns 52% of your constituents have. MP’s are representatives, not masters of their constituents, and we hope you keep that in mind.  

Letter to Steve Baker MP on EU Single Market Access

Today, the Wycombe Labour Party posted the following letter to Steve Baker MP. We look forward to his reply.   Dear Steve Baker MP,   We are writing to you...

More Stories >

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.